ES Mon–Fri · 09–18 AST · UTC −04:00

Personal Injury · Verdict Data

What Dominican Courts Actually Award Against Resorts: 2024–2026 Verdict Data

There is almost no public, sourced data on what Dominican courts award foreign visitors injured at resorts. This is that data — read directly from the operative part of published decisions, with the court, the date, and the decision number for each. Hotel names are omitted; the citations are public.

How much do Dominican courts award in resort injury cases?

Across the decisions analyzed for 2024–2026, Dominican awards to injured guests centered roughly between RD$200,000 and RD$1,000,000, with a high tail reaching RD$5,000,000 and, in US dollars, up to US$200,000. The highest final figure came from a zipline excursion case upheld by the Supreme Court at a total of US$107,783.99. How high any individual case reaches depends far more on the severity of the injury and the strength of the proof than on any average.

How was this verdict data compiled?

This is an analysis of 75 first-instance and appellate decisions from Dominican courts (2024–2026) involving a safety obligation or accommodation contract and a hotel or resort, identified within a larger corpus of nearly 99,000 published decisions. It is a sample of the decisions reviewed, not a claim of national completeness.

One methodological point matters: every figure below is read from the operative part (the dispositivo) of the published ruling — the section that states what the court actually ordered — rather than from summary or index fields, which can reflect what a plaintiff asked for rather than what was awarded. That distinction is why some widely repeated figures for Dominican cases are simply wrong.

What have Dominican courts awarded? (2024–2026 verdicts)

Each row below is a separate published decision. Awards are shown exactly as the court ordered them; "moral" refers to moral damages (pain and the human impact of the injury) and "material" to quantified economic loss.

CourtDateAward (from the decision)Decision №
2nd Chamber, La AltagraciaOct 31, 2024US$200,000 (moral) + RD$24,413.67 + CLP$3,062,149 (material) + 1%/mo interest1860-2024-SSEN-00719
Court of Appeal, San Pedro de MacorísJul 29, 2025RD$5,000,000 (moral) + material damages to be assessed335-2025-SSEN-00302
1st Chamber, La AltagraciaMar 11, 2026RD$2,000,000 + 1%/mo interest186-2026-SSEN-00261
1st Chamber, La AltagraciaFeb 11, 2026RD$500,000186-2026-SSEN-00099
2nd Chamber, La AltagraciaFeb 9, 2024US$20,000 (moral) + US$1,755 (material)1860-2024-SSEN-00111
Court of Appeal, San Pedro de MacorísOct 7, 2025RD$229,168 — reduced from RD$429,168 on appeal335-2025-SSEN-00443
2nd Chamber, La AltagraciaNov 11, 2024RD$100,000 (moral)1860-2024-SSEN-00738
2nd Chamber, La AltagraciaOct 31, 2024US$3,740.26 (material) + RD$20,000 (moral)1860-2024-SSEN-00722
2nd Chamber, La AltagraciaJul 23, 2024US$1,247.22 (material) + US$1,000 (moral)1860-2024-SSEN-00461

Separately, an excursion (zipline) injury to a US visitor was awarded a total of US$107,783.99 and upheld by the Supreme Court in November 2025 — first instance 1860-2023-SSEN-00372, confirmed at 335-2023-SSEN-00584, cassation rejected at SCJ-PS-25-2535 — making it final and irrevocable, with the signed liability waiver struck down as contrary to public order.

What is the US-dollar picture?

Dominican courts award foreign claimants in US dollars. The chart below shows the US-dollar awards among the verified decisions, to scale — a reminder that most awards are modest while a few sit far out on the high tail.

US$200,000 1860-2024-SSEN-00719
US$107,783.99 zipline — final on cassation
US$20,000 1860-2024-SSEN-00111
US$3,740.26 1860-2024-SSEN-00722
US$1,247.22 1860-2024-SSEN-00461
Verified US-dollar awards read from Dominican decisions, 2024–2026. Bars to scale; RD$ awards are listed in the table above and not shown here.

What patterns emerge from the awards?

Do Dominican courts ever reject resort injury claims?

Yes — weak cases fail, and honestly acknowledging that is part of reading this data correctly. In one 2024 La Altagracia matter the claim was dismissed outright and costs were taxed against the plaintiff. The lesson is not that claims are hopeless; it is that the strong ones are built on documented severity and evidence, which is exactly what an honest case assessment is meant to test. For how these claims work under Dominican law, see the personal injury guide; the record zipline award is discussed on the excursion & watersports injuries page.

Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. This information is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by using this site or its assessment tool. Figures are read from published decisions; additional decisions are catalogued and may be added as their citations are confirmed.